lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: VS: [PATCH] Smack: label for task objects (retry 2)
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Eric Paris wrote:

> 2) If #1 is true and you want to get Sign-off's in your parent tree
> you can set up the child trees as a remote. Then you can use:
>
> git format-patch -k --stdout HEAD..remotes/[child]/[branch] | git am
> -3 -k --whitespace=fix -s

I don't think this is the right approach. If you're pulling from a repo,
then your signoff does not go on each patch because you trust the repo.

Otherwise, you should actually be reviewing each patch, which the above is
not doing.

> Our tree is so simple I don't really understand why we need all this,
> but if we need it, lets figure out what works best for everyone!

Each LSM maintainer should probably be doing per-patch review of the
patches going into their tree, and adding their signoff, while I will try
and always just do pulls from those trees.


--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-05 23:43    [W:0.080 / U:2.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site