[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
    On 12/03/2010 09:45 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:

    > I'll have to go back and re-read that. Off the top of my head, I see no
    > way it could matter which container the numbers live in as long as they
    > keep advancing, and stay in the same runqueue. (hm, task weights would
    > have to be the same too or scaled. dangerous business, tinkering with
    > vruntimes)

    They're not necessarily in the same runqueue, the
    VCPU that is given time might be on another CPU
    than the one that was spinning on a lock.

    All rights reversed

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-03 15:51    [W:0.019 / U:48.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site