[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
On 12/03/2010 09:45 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> I'll have to go back and re-read that. Off the top of my head, I see no
> way it could matter which container the numbers live in as long as they
> keep advancing, and stay in the same runqueue. (hm, task weights would
> have to be the same too or scaled. dangerous business, tinkering with
> vruntimes)

They're not necessarily in the same runqueue, the
VCPU that is given time might be on another CPU
than the one that was spinning on a lock.

All rights reversed

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-03 15:51    [W:0.051 / U:1.736 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site