Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for December 27 (drivers/target) | From | James Bottomley <> | Date | Tue, 28 Dec 2010 09:08:35 -0600 |
| |
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 14:49 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 11:57 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:04:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly] > > > > > > Changes since 20101221: > > > > > > Linus' tree lost its build failure. > > > > > > Hi Nick, > > > > Please test building target code when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled. > > > > When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, drivers/target/ gets a boat load of build errors. > > > > Should TCM_IBLOCK depend on BLOCK? That fixes lots of the build errors, > > but not all of them. > > > > > > The header file include/target/target_core_base.h uses struct queue_limits, > > so it should #include <linux/blkdev.h>. > > > > > > Added the missing include here: > > target: Add linux/blkdev.h include in target_core_base.h > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=e8bd07d3a525e71b424d308fc5084b89a6456bb2 > > Thanks Randy!
Could you just do mod patches inline to the list, please? It's much less convenient trying to pull them out of a web page.
Thanks,
James
| |