lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Reiserfs deadlock in 2.6.36
From
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 06:50:48PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> Le jeudi 16 décembre 2010 14:49:48, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
>> > Le jeudi 2 décembre 2010 18:43:32, vous avez écrit :
>> > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 05:57:05PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> > > > Dear frederic,
>> I achieve to reproduce it. BTW it is my home partition with acl enable
>
> How do you know you reproduced it? You had a crash before using SysRq?
> Or you felt a deadlock or so?
>
> What's interesting is that report is that there is no blocked task
> that holds the reiserfs lock.
>
> So I really feel the problem is that someone opened the journal but did not
> release it.

Could you add a virtual lock for testing this hypothesis ? This lock
will be held during journal opening and releasing during journal
closing, using lockdep for testing this hypothesis ?
>
> How hard is it to reproduce now? If it's not so hard or haphazard, we should
> start a bisection. Otherwise I think we'll need to do some tracing and this
> is going to take several tries :)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-22 19:13    [W:0.063 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site