Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:23:09 -0500 | From | Nick Bowler <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up |
| |
On 2010-12-21 23:54 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 22 November 2010 16:17:23 Nick Bowler wrote: > > On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n" > > > for BKL itself. > > > > > > I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any > > > more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things. > > > > UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL. > > Would you mind running a kernel with this patch and lockdep enabled then?
I will definitely try it, but I probably won't get around to it before the new year.
Thanks,
-- Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
| |