[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] Added runqueue clock normalized with cpufreq
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 16:06 +0100, Harald Gustafsson wrote:
> 2010/12/17 Peter Zijlstra <>:
> > This is all assuming lowering the frequency is sensible to begin with in
> > the first place... but that's all part of the CPUfreq governor, it needs
> > to find a way to lower energy usage while conforming to the system
> > constraints.
> Yes, I and you have already suggested the safe way to not lower it below
> the total dl bandwidth. But for softer use cases it might be possible to
> e.g. exclude threads with longer periods than cpufreq change periods in the
> minimum frequency.

I was more hinting at the fact that CPUfreq is at best a controversial
approach to power savings. I much prefer the whole race-to-idle
approach, its much simpler.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-17 16:19    [W:0.059 / U:0.752 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site