Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:19:15 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [cpuops cmpxchg V2 5/5] cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics |
| |
On 12/16/2010 08:14 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Are you okay with the patches currently in percpu#for-next? If so, > I'll regenerate patches with your acked-by and pop the two previously > mentioned commits and proceed with the rest of the series. > > Thank you. >
Still looking through them (sorry.) I note that we probably do need to get Christoph's followup patches into -tip, so we need to get it all into tip; as such, even if it goes through your tree I'll need to pull it into a tip branch.
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |