[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 09/30] sound: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 19:00 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > For future reference please note that sound/soc is maintained as a
> > > subtree of ALSA - if you could send patches to that separately to myself
> > > and Liam as well as Takashi and Jaroslav that'd make life a little
> > > easier.
> > I can resplit and resend if necessary. Takashi, do you wanna take the
> > patch as-is or resplit? Or shall I route it through wq tree?
> No need, just merge it along with the rest of the patch however that's
> going. I was mentioning this for future reference rather than for the
> present patch.
> Liam, will the TWL6040 updates Magi posted the other day also be
> affected? I seem to remember they added the same pattern as WM835x has.

Not sure myself.

Magi, could you check your patch queue for any use of
flush_scheduled_work() here ?


Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-13 14:35    [W:0.062 / U:45.480 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site