lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [104/223] KVM: Write protect memory after slot swap
    On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
    > I don't have an objection to the patch, rather to the methodology where
    > stable kernels are more or less totally untested.  I would like at least the
    > kvm part to see some testing before it sees users.  The process we worked
    > out with Greg is:
    >
    > - Greg rejects kvm patches (but not virtio etc) pointing submitters to the
    > kvm maintainers
    > - The kvm maintainers collect stable kvm patches and autotest them
    > - They then submit the patches to stable@
    >
    > The process is slower than the standard stable process but results in
    > something that is less likely to fail.

    But all the patches tagged for -stable are supposed to be already
    upstream and therefore well tested.
    What am I missing?

    Regards,
    --
    Paolo
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-13 10:15    [W:0.020 / U:2.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site