lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)
From
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>
> NO. I don't think this is the correct one. Cause we don't want
> touch_softlockup_watchdog() to be called if
> CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y.
>
I think simply removing touch_softlockup_watchdog() definition from
hw_nmi.c is right. Am I right, Don?

thanks,
rakib


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-12 08:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans