lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)
    From
    On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
    > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
    >>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
    >>>
    >
    > NO. I don't think this is the correct one. Cause we don't want
    > touch_softlockup_watchdog() to be called if
    > CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y.
    >
    I think simply removing touch_softlockup_watchdog() definition from
    hw_nmi.c is right. Am I right, Don?

    thanks,
    rakib


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-12-12 08:35    [W:0.041 / U:0.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site