Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:08:24 -0500 |
| |
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Yeah, I was lost thinking about the busiest case where workers are > busy processing works consecutively. Usually workers are of course > switching in and out of idle state all the time. > > How about just dropping likely/unlikely?
OK, if I just remove it, can I add your Acked-by?
Thanks,
-- Steve
| |