lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] at91: Refactor Stamp9G20 and PControl G20 board file
On 2010-12-09 18:39, Igor Plyatov wrote:
> Dear Christian,
>
> > As PControl G20 is a carrier board for the Stamp9G20 SoM, some code can
> > be shared. Therefore board-stamp9g20.c is refactored to allow reusing the
> > SoM initialization and board-pcontrol-g20.c is modified to use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Glindkamp <christian.glindkamp@taskit.de>
> > ---
> >
> > How about this approach? Compile tested for PControl G20 and run time tested
> > for Stamp9G20 EVB and PortuxG20.
> >
> > Just a side note: PortuxG20 is not a carrier board for the Stamp9G20. It just
> > shares so much with the evaluation board, that it makes sense to put them both
> > into the same file. And there is no intention to put other boards into this
> > file.
>
> The idea from this patch is clean.
> Yours patch does not apply to the kernel from
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git,
> but I apply its content by hands and kernels compiled successfully with
> stamp9g20_defconfig and pcontrol_g20_defconfig.

I used exactly this repository. Revision 6313e3c21743cc88bb5bd8aa72948ee1e83937b6
to be precise. Maybe your mailer corrupted the patch.

> Please run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl with you patch and correct all errors
> and warnings reported.

I only get some "line over 80 characters" warnings, which can imho be
ignored.

>
> If you will correct this patch, to be applicable, then I will vote to
> include it into mainline.
>
> Which kernel repository and branch should I use for the AT91 ARM?
> I just want to know - whereto send my next patch to support gms machine?
>
> Best regards!
> --
> Igor Plyatov
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-10 09:51    [W:0.048 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site