lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups
From
Date
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 06:57 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> IMHO, cgroups should have been 'nice' from the start, but the folks who
> wrote it did what they thought best. I like nice a lot better than
> shares, so I used nice.

Agreed, but by the time I realized that the shares thing was already in
the wild. I did (probably still do) have a patch that adds a nice file
to the cgroup file.

Anyway, I think the whole proc/nice interface for autogroups is already
a tad too far. If people want control they can use cgroups, but I really
don't care enough to argue much about it.





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-01 12:35    [W:1.606 / U:1.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site