Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:33:22 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 06:57 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > IMHO, cgroups should have been 'nice' from the start, but the folks who > wrote it did what they thought best. I like nice a lot better than > shares, so I used nice.
Agreed, but by the time I realized that the shares thing was already in the wild. I did (probably still do) have a patch that adds a nice file to the cgroup file.
Anyway, I think the whole proc/nice interface for autogroups is already a tad too far. If people want control they can use cgroups, but I really don't care enough to argue much about it.
| |