[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] include/linux/kernel.h: Move logging bits to include/linux/logging.h
    On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 16:00 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
    > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:17:56AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
    > > Differences in logging.h to original kernel.h
    > > were done for cleanliness and checkpatch.
    > Yet another reason why I detest mindless use of checkpatch.

    If it makes you happier, I didn't use it here nor do I
    generally use checkpatch, (just ask Andrew Morton), I just
    wrote that more as a shorthand for kernel style conformance.

    > I **really** dislike patches that try to do any kind of
    > cleanup ( or otherwise) at the same time as they move
    > code around.

    So fine, I'll do a minimal code movement only patch
    followed by a style cleansing patch.

    Anyone else have an opinion on using logging.h vs printk.h
    as an include name?

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-09 22:11    [W:0.018 / U:61.704 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site