lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectQ: perf_event && task->ptrace_bps[]
    Hello.

    I am trying to understand the usage of hw-breakpoints in arch_ptrace().
    ptrace_set_debugreg() and related code looks obviously racy. Nothing
    protects us against flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint() called by the dying
    tracee. Afaics we can leak perf_event or use the already freed memory
    or both.

    Am I missed something?

    Looking into the git history, I don't even know which patch should be
    blamed (if I am right), there were too many changes. I noticed that
    2ebd4ffb6d0cb877787b1e42be8485820158857e "perf events: Split out task
    search into helper" moved the PF_EXITING check from find_get_context().
    This check coould help if sys_ptrace() races with SIGKILL, but it was
    racy anyway.

    It is not clear to me what should be done. Looking more, I do not
    understand the scope of perf_event/ctx at all, sys_perf_event_open()
    looks wrong too, see the next email I am going to send.

    Oleg.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-08 16:05    [W:4.097 / U:0.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site