Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:06:48 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: dyntick-hpc and RCU |
| |
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:38:17AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > 2010/11/5 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>: > > For now #3 seems to me more viable (with one of the adds I proposed). > > Doh, but I forgot it's not preemptable! So #2 looks then more viable. > Unless we can tweak #3 into getting it preemptable.
There are ways of getting preemptiblity working. This might not be all that big a modification to TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, now that I think of it.
Thanx, Paul
| |