[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kernel: make /proc/kallsyms mode 400 to reduce ease of attacking

* Marcus Meissner <> wrote:

> Hi,
> Making /proc/kallsyms readable only for root makes it harder for attackers to
> write generic kernel exploits by removing one source of knowledge where things are
> in the kernel.

Cc:-ed Linus - i think he argued in favor of such a patch in the past.

I generally agree with such patches (i have written some myself), but there's a few
questions with this one, which make this limited change ineffective and which make
it harder to implement a fuller patch that makes it truly harder to figure out the
precise kernel build:

- The real security obstruction effect is very small from this measure alone: the
overwhelming majority of our users are running distro kernels, so the
file (and hence 99% of /proc/kallsyms content) is well-known - unless we also
restrict 'uname -r' from nonprivileged users-ace. Hiding that might make sense -
but the two should be in one patch really.

- ( It will break a few tools that can be run as a plain user out of box - perf
for example. "chmod a+r /proc/kallsyms" during bootup will work that around so
it's not the end of the world. )

- For self-built kernels it might make sense - but there's "chmod a-r
/proc/kallsyms" during bootup one can do already.

- There's the side-question of module symbols - those are dynamically allocated
hence arguably per system. But module symbols make up only 1% on a typical
booted up full distro box.

So what does a distribution like Suse expect from this change alone? Those have
public packages in rpms which can be downloaded by anyone, so it makes little sense
to hide it - unless _all_ version information is hidden.

So i'd like to see a _full_ version info sandboxing patch that thinks through all
the angles and restricts uname -r kernel version info as well, and makes dmesg
unaccessible to users - and closes a few other information holes as well that give
away the exact kernel version - _that_ together will make it hard to blindly attack
a very specific kernel version.

But without actually declaring and achieving that sandboxing goal this security
measure is just a feel-good thing really - and makes it harder to make more
difficult steps down the road, like closing 'uname -r' ...

I fully expect Linus to overrule me on this, but hey, i had to try it and lay out my
arguments :-)



 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-04 12:49    [W:0.089 / U:0.752 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site