lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] Reclaim invalidated page ASAP
Date
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:18:22 +0000, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> I would agree except as said elsewhere, it's a chicken and egg problem.
> We don't have a real world test because fadvise is not useful in its
> current iteration. I'm hoping that there will be a test comparing
>
> rsync on vanilla kernel
> rsync on patched kernel
> rsync+patch on vanilla kernel
> rsync+patch on patched kernel
>
> Are the results of such a test likely to happen?
>
Yes, absolutely, although I'm sorry it has taken so long. Between
thanksgiving and the impending end of the semester things have been a
bit hectic. Nevertheless, I just finished putting together a script to
record some metics from /proc/vmstat and /proc/[pid]/statm, so at this
point I'm ready to finally take some data. Any suggestions for
particular patterns to look for in the numbers or other metrics to
record are welcome. Cheers,

- Ben


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-30 15:13    [W:0.056 / U:1.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site