Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) | From | David Rientjes <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus |
| |
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Figo.zhang wrote:
> CAP_SYS_RESOURCE also had better get 3% bonus for protection. >
Would you like to elaborate as to why?
> Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com> > --- > mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c > index 4029583..30b24b9 100644 > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c > @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem, > * Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory() > * implementation used by LSMs. > */ > - if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > + if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || > + has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) > points -= 30; > > /*
| |