lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC 4/4]x86: avoid tlbstate lock if no enough cpus
From
Date
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 15:12 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 15:06 +0800, Shaohua Li a écrit :
> > just don't want to include the non-present cpus here. I wonder why we
> > haven't a variable to record online cpu number.
>
> What prevents a 256 cpus machine, to have 8 online cpus that all use the
> same TLB vector ?
>
> (Max 32 vectors, so 8 cpus share each vector, settled at boot time)
>
> Forget about 'online', and think 'possible' ;)
Hmm, the spread vectors to node already merged, how could the 8 cpus
share a vector?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-03 08:23    [W:0.038 / U:0.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site