[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/11] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 23:47 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> That may not be wise. Your real bus heirarchy may not be architecturally
> defined on some systems so you can't incorporate it into code, nor is it
> necessarily a heirarchy - eg some of the Geodes.

Ok, so I'd suggest doing something like:

- pci is below the corresponding atom node
- isa is a child of pci

The later is a useful representation even if it doesn't correspond to
reality. From an address representation perspective, ISA can be
considered somewhat as a substractive decoding child of PCI (again even
if that's not 100% true), which simplifies the representation in the
device-tree a bit, and allows to still have things like VGA devices on
the PCI segment that decode IO ports in the ISA range.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-30 03:53    [W:0.067 / U:10.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site