Messages in this thread | | | From | "Tomoya MORINAGA" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 6/17 v3] can: EG20T PCH: Fix endianness issue | Date | Thu, 25 Nov 2010 20:10:53 +0900 |
| |
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010 10:31 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote :
>> For easy to read, some sub-functions are created. >> >> >> Modify complex "goto" to do~while. >What about the next_flag in the rx_normal function? Can you get rid of >it, too? Subsequent Patch (11/17 Delete unnecessary ...) deletes "next_flag" in the rx_normal function.
--- Thanks,
Tomoya MORINAGA OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de> To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@dsn.okisemi.com> Cc: "Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@grandegger.com>; "Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@pengutronix.de>; "Christian Pellegrin" <chripell@fsfe.org>; "Barry Song" <21cnbao@gmail.com>; "Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>; <socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de>; <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>; <andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com>; <qi.wang@intel.com>; <margie.foster@intel.com>; <yong.y.wang@intel.com>; <kok.howg.ewe@intel.com>; <joel.clark@intel.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 10:31 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 6/17 v3] can: EG20T PCH: Fix endianness issue
| |