[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] jump label: updates for 2.6.37
    On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:10 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:

    > Anyway, I just tried what you explained with the current kernel, with
    > and without jump labels and, without jump labels, the module has its
    > kmalloc tracepoint traced, but with jump labels it does not. So we can
    > treat this as a regression, which is something that can go into an -rc.
    > The change log must state that this _is_ a regression, or Linus may not
    > accept it.

    I really dislike the first patch... Preferably I'd simply fully revert
    all the jump-label stuff and try again next round with a saner

    There's a really good simple fix for this, simply disable the gcc
    trickery for .37 and use the fallback.

    Then for .38, mandate the key type to be atomic_t * and switch to the
    SWITCH_POINT() interface from hpa.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-24 09:31    [W:0.020 / U:56.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site