[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [thiscpuops upgrade 10/10] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Hmm, this only works for power of two NR_CPUS, or else one cpu 'tid'
> could wrap on another cpu tid.

Hmm... That essentially like using a bitfield then.

> I suggest using 4096 (or roundup_pow_of_two(CONFIG_NR_CPUS))

There could be machines with 64k cpus soon. So I guess roundupp2 it will
have to be.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-24 04:15    [W:0.108 / U:21.840 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site