Messages in this thread | | | From | Milton Miller <> | Subject | Re: trivial: make comment about vs{n,cn,}printf more understandable | Date | Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:04:04 -0600 |
| |
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 at about 16:12:45 -0000, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > "You probably want ... instead." sounds like a recommendation better > not to use the v... functions. >
Which is true, if you dont' have a va_list its hard to get them. But I do get your point.
> * the @buf not including the trailing '\0'. If @size is <= 0 the function > * returns 0. > * > - * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list. > - * You probably want scnprintf() instead. > + * If you're not already dealing with a va_list better use scnprintf().
That doesn't flow off my (mid-western usa) tounge.
How about * Call this function if you are already dealing with a va_list. * Otherwise you probably want to use scnprintf().
Alternatively, * If you're not already dealing with a va_list consider scnprintf().
Thanks, milton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |