[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] generic-ipi: add lock context annotations
    2010-11-22 (월), 13:46 +0100, Peter Zijlstra:
    > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 16:33 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
    > > The ipi_call_[un]lock[_irq] functions grab/release a spin lock
    > > but were missing proper annotations. Add it.
    > I really have to ask why bother? Why not add some smarts to whatever
    > uses these annotations?

    I just thought that removing bogus warnings from sparse helps us focus
    on real issues when using it. Currently sparse emits too many messages
    and some (many?) of them might be removed trivially (or by adding bit of
    ugliness. :( )

    BTW, I didn't get what you mean about "some smarts". Could you explain
    them little more?


    Namhyung Kim

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-23 04:23    [W:0.019 / U:7.644 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site