lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] generic-ipi: add lock context annotations
    From
    Date
    2010-11-22 (월), 13:46 +0100, Peter Zijlstra:
    > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 16:33 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
    > > The ipi_call_[un]lock[_irq] functions grab/release a spin lock
    > > but were missing proper annotations. Add it.
    >
    > I really have to ask why bother? Why not add some smarts to whatever
    > uses these annotations?

    I just thought that removing bogus warnings from sparse helps us focus
    on real issues when using it. Currently sparse emits too many messages
    and some (many?) of them might be removed trivially (or by adding bit of
    ugliness. :( )

    BTW, I didn't get what you mean about "some smarts". Could you explain
    them little more?

    Thanks.

    --
    Regards,
    Namhyung Kim


    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-23 04:23    [W:0.019 / U:123.536 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site