Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:30:58 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch during suspend/resume |
| |
On 11/21/2010 01:27 AM, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > We have a few others things that want to modify their behaviour > according to whether we're doing the atomic copy/restore. Perhaps it > would be an idea to just use a single flag, perhaps a value for > system_state?
system_state is pretty much considered harmful...
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |