[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch during suspend/resume
On 11/21/2010 01:27 AM, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> We have a few others things that want to modify their behaviour
> according to whether we're doing the atomic copy/restore. Perhaps it
> would be an idea to just use a single flag, perhaps a value for
> system_state?

system_state is pretty much considered harmful...


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-22 03:35    [W:0.139 / U:15.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site