lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cgroup: prefer [kv]zalloc over [kv]malloc+memset in memory controller code.
* Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> [2010-11-01 20:40:56]:

> Hi (please CC me on replies),
>
>
> Apologies to those who receive this multiple times. I screwed up the To:
> field in my original mail :-(
>
>
> In mem_cgroup_alloc() we currently do either kmalloc() or vmalloc() then
> followed by memset() to zero the memory. This can be more efficiently
> achieved by using kzalloc() and vzalloc().
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
> ---
> memcontrol.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 9a99cfa..90da698 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4199,14 +4199,13 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void)
>
> /* Can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is very big */
> if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
> - mem = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + mem = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> else
> - mem = vmalloc(size);
> + mem = vzalloc(size);
>
> if (!mem)
> return NULL;
>
> - memset(mem, 0, size);
> mem->stat = alloc_percpu(struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu);
> if (!mem->stat) {
> if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
>


Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


--
Three Cheers,
Balbir


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-02 06:11    [W:0.107 / U:0.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site