lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] vfio: Extended capability fixes
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:08:35PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> - Virtual channel position gets truncated as a u8
> - Print the ecap that's unknown, not the last cap we saw
> - Print actual config offset, which provides enough info to make
> some sense of the error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c
> index 8af995d..8304316 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pci_config.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int vfio_msi_cap_len(struct vfio_dev *vdev, u8 pos)
> * Determine extended capability length for VC (2 & 9) and
> * MFVC capabilities
> */
> -static int vfio_vc_cap_len(struct vfio_dev *vdev, u8 pos)
> +static int vfio_vc_cap_len(struct vfio_dev *vdev, u16 pos)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
> u32 dw;
> @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ int vfio_build_config_map(struct vfio_dev *vdev)
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> "%s: pci config conflict at %x, "
> "caps %x %x\n",
> - __func__, i, map[pos+i], cap);
> + __func__, pos+i, map[pos+i], cap);
> map[pos+i] = cap;
> }
> ret = pci_read_config_byte(pdev, pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT, &pos);
> @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ int vfio_build_config_map(struct vfio_dev *vdev)
> if (len == 0 || len == 0xFF) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> "%s: unknown length for pci ext cap %x\n",
> - __func__, cap);
> + __func__, ecap);
> len = PCI_CAP_SIZEOF;
> }
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> @@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ int vfio_build_config_map(struct vfio_dev *vdev)
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> "%s: pci config conflict at %x, "
> "caps %x %x\n",
> - __func__, i, map[epos+i], ecap);
> + __func__, epos+i, map[epos+i], ecap);
> map[epos+i] = ecap;

Not related to this patch, but I am surprised checkpatch does not
complain about lack of spaces around + here and elsewhere.
Or does it?

> }
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-02 20:13    [W:0.042 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site