lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com> wrote:
> On that note, is there a good reason why the notify_on_release interface
> works the way it does? Wouldn't it be simpler if the cgroup simply
> provided a file on which a process (e.g. systemd) could block?

Backwards-compatibility with cpusets, which is what cgroups evolved from.

A delete_on_release option would be possible too, for the cases where
there's really no entity that wants to do more than simply delete the
group in question.

Paul


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-19 21:41    [W:0.172 / U:0.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site