[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] checkpoint-restart: naked patch
On 11/19/2010 05:27 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
>>> The paragon of absurdity is struct task_struct::did_exec .
>> Yeah, then go and figure how to do that in a way which would be useful
>> for other purposes too instead of trying to shove the whole
>> checkpointer inside the kernel. It sure would be harder but hey
>> that's the way it is.
> System call for one bit? This is ridiculous.

Why not just a flag in proc entry? It's a frigging single bit.

> Doing execve(2) for userspace C/R is ridicoulous too (and likely
> doesn't work).

Really, whatever. Just keep doing what you're doing. Hey, if it
makes you happy, it can't be too wrong.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-19 17:35    [W:0.088 / U:1.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site