[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] checkpoint-restart: naked patch
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
>> The paragon of absurdity is struct task_struct::did_exec .
> Yeah, then go and figure how to do that in a way which would be useful
> for other purposes too instead of trying to shove the whole
> checkpointer inside the kernel.  It sure would be harder but hey
> that's the way it is.

System call for one bit? This is ridiculous.
Doing execve(2) for userspace C/R is ridicoulous too (and likely doesn't work).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-19 17:29    [W:0.077 / U:25.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site