lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Galbraith patch
From
Date
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 10:05 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday, November 19, 2010, Jordi Pujol wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >it requires a little modification,
> >
> >CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG should not be a condition to create autogroup in
> >structure task_group
> >
> >remove
> > && defined(CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG)
> >in the following conditional:
> >
> >+++ linux-2.6.36/kernel/sched.c
> >@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
> >
> > #include "sched_cpupri.h"
> > #include "workqueue_sched.h"
> >+#include "sched_autogroup.h"
> >
> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > #include <trace/events/sched.h>
> >@@ -268,6 +269,10 @@ struct task_group {
> > struct task_group *parent;
> > struct list_head siblings;
> > struct list_head children;
> >+
> >+#if (defined(CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP) && defined(CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG))
> >+ struct autogroup *autogroup;
> >+#endif
> > };
> >
> >Kind,
> >
> >Jordi Pujol
>
> Thanks Jordi, but my last attempted build, using only the last 2 patches
> that Mike posted on a fresh unpack of 2.6.36, couldn't get past stage 2 of
> the modules build, it kept squawking about all the IR control stuff that is
> not even configured to be built.

No idea what's going on with that. Maybe you should wait until I get
the /proc display/tweak interface cobbled together and post a checked
over patch instead of hasty WIP snapshot.

> I wonder how long it will take to get work this into mainline?

If it goes in at all, it won't be before .38.

> Along the same line, how does this compare to CK's bfs patch?

Like apple vs orange.

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-19 17:23    [W:0.052 / U:7.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site