[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:36:48AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> There was concern that FITRIM ioctl is not common enough to be included
> in core vfs ioctl, as Christoph Hellwig pointed out there's no real point
> in dispatching this out to a separate vector instead of just through
> ->ioctl.
> So this commit removes ioctl_fstrim() from vfs ioctl and trim_fs
> from super_operation structure.
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <>

Trying to redirect this thread back to the original patches....

What do people think? Should I try to push these two patches to Linus
now, to make it easier for other file systems who might be interested
in implementing FITRIM functionality?

Or should I wait until the 2.6.37-rc1 window?

We're at -rc3, so a change like this is a bit late, but so far no one
else is using trim_fs besides ext4, and it will make life easier for
other file systems, so I'm willing to try pushing this to Linus if
there is consensus from other fs developers.

- Ted

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-19 16:43    [W:0.102 / U:1.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site