[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 07:55 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > In general though, I think you can say that: cgroups ass overhead.
> I really think you meant "add" here ? (Hey! The keys were next to each other!)
> ;)

Uhm, quite!

> > Simply because you add constraints, this means you need to 1) account
> > more, 2) enforce constraints. Both have definite non-zero cost in both
> > data and time.
> Yep, this looks like one of these perpetual throughput vs latency trade-offs.
Trade-off sure, throughput vs latency only in a specific use-case, its
more a feature vs cost thing, just like all them trace people want lower
cost tracing but want more features at the same time..

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-19 14:03    [W:0.166 / U:8.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site