lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.37-rc2-git4: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36
    On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
    > 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
    > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
    >
    > If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us know
    > either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
    > of the entries below are invalid.

    > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21652
    > Subject : several problems with intel graphics since 2.6.36
    > Submitter : Norbert Preining<preining@logic.at>
    > Date : 2010-10-27 14:32 (23 days old)
    > Message-ID :<20101027143252.GA8676@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
    > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128818998630241&w=2

    That one is interesting to me.. I suspect it may be the same cause
    as for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21952

    I have one of those Samsung (N210) Netbooks here: works fine with 2.6.34 and
    earlier,
    but fails to come out of suspend on 2.6.35/2.6.36 (haven't tried 2.6.37).

    So perhaps add 21952 to the list, or link it to the 21652
    (kind of amusing how similar the bug numbers are..).


    My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
    regression with 2.6.36. But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (and earlier,
    back many years). As a result, I'm stuck with 2.6.35 for the time being,
    and lack the time for a concerted debug effort on 2.6.36+ right now.

    Cheers


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-19 01:49    [W:0.022 / U:91.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site