lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] x86: only call smp_processor_id in non-preempt cases
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:49:21PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:14:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are some paths that walk the die_chain with preemption on.
> > >
> > > What are those codepaths? At minimum it's worth documenting them.
> >
> > Well the one that caused the bug was do_general_protection which walks the
> > die_chain with DIE_GPF.
> >
> > I can document them, though it might be time consuming to audit them and hope they
> > don't change.
>
> Listing one example is enough.
>
> > [...] I guess my bigger question is, is it expected that anyone who calls the
> > die_chain to have preemption disabled? If not, then does it matter if we document
> > it?
>
> Yes, it might be a bug to call those handlers with preemption on (or even with irqs
> on). But if the code is fine as-is then documenting a single example would be nice.
>

Is this better?

Cheers,
Don

------------------------------------->
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:34:33 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] x86: only call smp_processor_id in non-preempt cases

There are some paths that walk the die_chain with preemption on.
Make sure we are in an NMI call before we start doing anything.

This was triggered by do_general_protection calling notify_die with
DIE_GPF.

Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
index 5c4f952..ef4755d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
{
struct die_args *args = __args;
struct pt_regs *regs;
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ int cpu;

switch (cmd) {
case DIE_NMI:
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
}

regs = args->regs;
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();

if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(backtrace_mask))) {
static arch_spinlock_t lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
--
1.7.3.2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-18 16:39    [W:0.038 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site