[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Have trace_printk()s in the events/ directory
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:06:36AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 13:53 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > n other solution, which have been talking with Thomas yesterday, would be
> > to allow having a single fd for several perf_events at once. That would
> > solve some problems when you have hundreds of events opened (think about
> > wide tracing, or use of all individual syscalls).
> I would highly recommend this. One type of tracing I do all the time is
> to enable all events (over 600). I don't think that is currently
> possible with trace and/or perf.


> Ftrace has no issue simple because it just stores all the events into a
> single buffer (per cpu though). It does not care if there's one event or
> 1000.
> You need to figure out how to do this as well with the function tracer.

Yeah for the function (and graph) tracers, I really plan to make it a single
event. I mean one for the function tracer and one for the function graph.
Although we may want two for the function graph tracer actually. One for
entry, one for exit.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-18 15:05    [W:0.082 / U:35.316 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site