Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 18 Nov 2010 06:06:30 -0700 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation |
| |
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:36:48AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > There was concern that FITRIM ioctl is not common enough to be included > in core vfs ioctl, as Christoph Hellwig pointed out there's no real point > in dispatching this out to a separate vector instead of just through > ->ioctl.
Um, are you and Josef working independently of each other? You don't seem to be cc'ing each other on your patches, and you're basically doing the same thing.
-- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."
|  |