[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for November 17
    On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:59:20 -0800 Randy Dunlap <> wrote:
    > Why was #include <linux/smp_lock.h> removed from <linux/hardirq.h> ?
    > I added #include <linux/smp_lock.h> to i387.h, but them mm/filemap.c build fails
    > with the same error:
    > linux-next-20101117/mm/filemap.c: In function 'iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic':
    > linux-next-20101117/mm/filemap.c:1936: error: implicit declaration of function 'kernel_locked'

    Was this fixed before Linus took that patch? Also, the #include of
    linux/smp_lock.h in linux/hardirq.h was the only line between #ifdef
    CONFIG_PREEMPT and #endif ... was this patch even reviewed?

    Maybe (after it was reviewed) it should have been given more time in
    linux-next before being merged.

    Stephen Rothwell
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-18 00:17    [W:0.020 / U:1.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site