[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] New utility: 'trace'
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:51:52 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:47 +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
> > I see --call-graph in the trace record -h output, but it doesn't
> > seem to work on x86_64 for me.
> If you want to unwind userspace you need to build everything with
> framepointers -- sadly some people have been lobbying to remove
> framepointers from all distro builds, even though on x86_64 its nearly
> free (i386 does have a significant performance benefit, sadly).
> There's some work on-going to simply copy out the top of stack and let
> dwarves go wild at it in userspace, but that isn't done yet.

Even without frame-pointers I should see at least the first caller in
userspace, since that can be obtained by reading the return address of
the syscall, right?
I don't see any difference in the output of 'trace report' thats why
I'm asking it is implemented at all right now, or I need additional
flags to see it.

I do see some difference in output of 'perf record -g/perf report'

Best regards,

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-17 14:07    [W:0.118 / U:2.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site