[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation
    On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 03:59:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
    > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:20:18PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
    > > So, I decided to reimplement it to be completely synchronous. SYSFS
    > > authors did really great job and thanks to the excellent internal SYSFS
    > > design and implementation it is absolutely safe. See:
    > >
    > > [root@tgt ~]# modprobe scst
    > > [root@tgt ~]# cd /sys/kernel/scst_tgt/
    > Sorry, but no, you can't put this in /sys/kernel/ without getting the
    > approval of the sysfs maintainer.
    > I really don't understand why you are using kobjects in the first place,
    > why isn't this in the main device tree in the kernel, using 'struct
    > device'?

    It is my understanding that Vlad is able to reflect the topology by
    manipulating sysfs objects there.

    > In the end, I guess it really doesn't matter as this code isn't getting
    > merged so I shouldn't worry about it, right?

    This is quite unfortunate as I still have not seen the public comparison
    of the 2 implementations and the lists of benefits and shortfalls for
    both of them.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-15 08:01    [W:0.021 / U:1.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site