lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [resend][PATCH 2/4] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable"
    Date
    > > > Yes, I've tested it, and it deprecates the tunable as expected.  A single 
    > > > warning message serves the purpose well: let users know one time without
    > > > being overly verbose that the tunable is deprecated and give them
    > > > sufficient time (2 years) to start using the new tunable. That's how
    > > > deprecation is done.
    > >
    > > no sense.
    > >
    > > Why do their application need to rewrite for *YOU*? Okey, you will got
    > > benefit from your new knob. But NOBDOY use the new one. and People need
    > > to rewrite their application even though no benefit.
    > >
    > > Don't do selfish userland breakage!
    >
    > And you said you ignore bug even though you have seen it. It suck!


    At v2.6.36-rc1, oom-killer doesn't work at all because YOU BROKE.
    And I was working on fixing it.

    2010-08-19
    http://marc.info/?t=128223176900001&r=1&w=2
    http://marc.info/?t=128221532700003&r=1&w=2
    http://marc.info/?t=128221532500008&r=1&w=2

    However, You submitted new crap before the fixing.

    2010-08-15
    http://marc.info/?t=128184669600001&r=1&w=2

    If you tested mainline a bit, you could find the problem quickly.
    You should have fixed mainline kernel at first.


    Again, YOU HAVEN'T TESTED YOUR OWN PATCH AT ALL.







    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-15 01:27    [W:0.026 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site