Messages in this thread | | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Subject | Re: [resend][PATCH 2/4] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable" | Date | Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:24:17 +0900 (JST) |
| |
> > > Yes, I've tested it, and it deprecates the tunable as expected. A single > > > warning message serves the purpose well: let users know one time without > > > being overly verbose that the tunable is deprecated and give them > > > sufficient time (2 years) to start using the new tunable. That's how > > > deprecation is done. > > > > no sense. > > > > Why do their application need to rewrite for *YOU*? Okey, you will got > > benefit from your new knob. But NOBDOY use the new one. and People need > > to rewrite their application even though no benefit. > > > > Don't do selfish userland breakage! > > And you said you ignore bug even though you have seen it. It suck!
At v2.6.36-rc1, oom-killer doesn't work at all because YOU BROKE. And I was working on fixing it.
2010-08-19 http://marc.info/?t=128223176900001&r=1&w=2 http://marc.info/?t=128221532700003&r=1&w=2 http://marc.info/?t=128221532500008&r=1&w=2
However, You submitted new crap before the fixing.
2010-08-15 http://marc.info/?t=128184669600001&r=1&w=2
If you tested mainline a bit, you could find the problem quickly. You should have fixed mainline kernel at first.
Again, YOU HAVEN'T TESTED YOUR OWN PATCH AT ALL.
| |