[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro <> wrote:
> Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :)
Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where
fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg should at least satisfy my
personal needs so I'll shut up now. Thanks!

- Ben

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-14 06:23    [W:0.098 / U:1.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site