lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Implement a virtio GPU transport
    On 10/11/10 17:47, Anthony Liguori wrote:
    > On 11/10/2010 11:22 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
    >> Ping ?
    >
    > I think the best way forward is to post patches.

    I posted links to the git trees. I can post patches, but they are
    *large*. Do you really want me to post them?

    > To summarize what I was trying to express in the thread, I think this is
    > not the right long term architecture but am not opposed to it as a short
    > term solution. I think having a new virtio device is a bad design choice
    > but am not totally opposed to it.

    Ok! (I agree (that this should be a short term solution) :) )

    > you want to go for the path of integration, you're going to have to fix
    > all of the coding style issues and make the code fit into QEMU. Dropping
    > a bunch of junk into target-i386/ is not making the code fit into QEMU.

    I agree. how about hw/gl for the renderer and hw/ for the virtio module?

    > If you post just what you have now in patch form, I can try to provide
    > more concrete advice ignoring the coding style problems.

    I can post patches, although I dont think LKML would appreciate the
    volume! I can post them to the qemu list if you do.

    -Ian


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-12 13:23    [W:3.325 / U:0.592 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site