lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty task groups
On 2010.11.11 at 12:35 -0700, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 20:15 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> > Just to add some data; here are the results from my machine (AMD 4
> > cores) running a -j4 kernel build, while I browsed the web:
> >
> > 1) perf sched record sleep 30
> >
> > without:
> > total_wakeups: 44306
> > avg_wakeup_latency (ns): 36784
> > min_wakeup_latency (ns): 0
> > max_wakeup_latency (ns): 9378852
> >
> > with:
> > total_wakeups: 43836
> > avg_wakeup_latency (ns): 67607
> > min_wakeup_latency (ns): 0
> > max_wakeup_latency (ns): 8983036
> >
> > 2) perf record -a -e sched:sched_switch -e sched:sched_wakeup sleep 10
> >
> > without:
> > total_wakeups: 13195
> > avg_wakeup_latency (ns): 48484
> > min_wakeup_latency (ns): 0
> > max_wakeup_latency (ns): 8722497
> >
> > with:
> > total_wakeups: 14106
> > avg_wakeup_latency (ns): 92532
> > min_wakeup_latency (ns): 20
> > max_wakeup_latency (ns): 5642393
> >
> > So the avg_wakeup_latency nearly doubled with your patch, while the
> > max_wakeup_latency is lowered by a good amount.
>
> When you say with/without, does that mean enabled/disabled, or
> patched/virgin and/or cgroups/nocgroups?

Patched/virgin and nocgroups
--
Markus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-11 20:41    [W:0.236 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site