Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:18:43 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 14/18] fs: Protect inode->i_state with th einode->i_lock |
| |
> > Ah, done thinking now! I was so the i_state field had been set > before the inode was added to various lists and potentially > accessable to other threads. I should probably add a comment to that > effect, right?
Yes, please.
| |