lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: poll/select performance on datagram sockets
From
Date

> Problem is the peer_wait, that epoll doesnt seem to be plugged into.
>
> Bug is in unix_dgram_poll()
>
> It calls sock_poll_wait( ... &unix_sk(other)->peer_wait,) only if socket
> is 'writable'. Its a clear bug
>
> Try this patch please ?
>
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index 0ebc777..315716c 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -2092,7 +2092,7 @@ static unsigned int unix_dgram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
>
> /* writable? */
> writable = unix_writable(sk);
> - if (writable) {
> + if (1 /*writable*/) {
> other = unix_peer_get(sk);
> if (other) {
> if (unix_peer(other) != sk) {
>
>
>

Also you'll need to change your program to make the epoll registrations
_after_ sockets connect(), or else you can see that epoll() wont know
about the other peer stuff.

for (i = 0 ; i < NB_CLIENTS ; i++) {
client_fds[i] = socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
}


for (i = 0 ; i < NB_CLIENTS ; i++) {
connect(client_fds[i], (struct sockaddr*)&addr_server, sizeof(addr_server));
}

ev.events = EPOLLOUT;
ev.data.fd = client_fds[NB_CLIENTS-1];
if (epoll_ctl(epollfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, client_fds[NB_CLIENTS-1], &ev) == -1) {
perror("epoll_ctl: client_fds max");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (trigger == 0) {
ev.events = EPOLLOUT;
ev.data.fd = client_fds[0];
if (epoll_ctl(epollfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, client_fds[0], &ev) == -1) {
perror("epoll_ctl: client_fds 0");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-30 15:21    [W:0.090 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site