[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] IMA: making i_readcount a first class inode citizen
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:29 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Dave Chinner <> wrote:
> >
> > Why the wrapper functions and locking? Why not an atomic variable like
> > i_writecount?
> Indeed. With moving this more into the VFS, let's just make sure it
> looks like i_writecount as much as possible.

My thought was that the IMA read/write checks should happen AFTER the
i_writecount and i_readcount counters were updated. Thus even if we
raced with another task we can rest assured that the other task would
catch the situation we missed....


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-29 00:49    [W:0.052 / U:5.388 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site