lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability
Date
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:09:02 -0400, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:35:07AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:47:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> > > What we need in the first step is to get VFS changes reviewed.Once we
> > > agree on the VFS changes done, then we can start looking at the changes
> > > upto NFS richacl nfs support. When get that merged then we can start
> > > having discussion on how local file system maintainers want to migrate
> > > the existing file system with posixacl to richacl.
> >
> > OK. So, personally: I'm resigned to the idea that we want support for
> > this ACL model. The vfs changes look OK to me (and wouldn't be changed
> > by any comments I'd have on the more richacl-specific patches to
> > follow). So that's an ACK from me on the first set of these patches,
> > assuming it's OK with people to merge these things one step at a time.
>
> Is there any progress on this?
>

The next step would be to get Al Viro or Christoph to look at the
proposed VFS changes and get an ACK on them. Meanwhile i can rebase
the full series to the latest linux kernel.

Apart from that is there any specific changes you would like to see
as a part of richacl patch series. Would you like to see the full
patchset posted to the list or should we go in steps as mentioned above
?

-aneesh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-26 06:39    [W:0.088 / U:0.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site